- 4,000+projects delivered
- 70+clients
- 12+years in practice
- 6 yrsaverage engineer experience
Non-patent literature (NPL) covers work published in scientific journal databases, digital documents, theses, product documentation, and public disclosures made on websites, social media, datasheets and magazines. A thorough assessment of that existing art saves you time, improves the quality of your patents, and makes them more useful to more people.
Why Search Non-Patent Literature?
Trace what an innovation is built on
To identify the papers, dissertations and cited literature an innovation rests on.
Track competitor strategy and market moves
To check competitive business strategies, product launches, sales, mergers, consumer behaviour and application areas.
See disclosures before patents publish
Non-patent information is accessible before a patent or application publishes — which can take around 18 months — so an applicant gets an earlier read on the art.
Support opposition and litigation
When a patent is being opposed or litigated, non-patent literature can supply art that patent databases alone will not.
Infringement and licensing
NPL searching plays a significant role in infringement and licensing work, where the task is to identify products that correspond to a patent.
Cover what patents miss
Searches covering literature and goods not usually captured by patents are valuable before a business decision, or before a search in a specific area.
Combine with other search types
NPL searching integrates with many patent searches, including landscape searches, patentability searches and due diligence.
Who It Is For
- Organisations engaged in R&D.
- Universities and research institutes, including technology transfer offices.
- Inventors and researchers.
- Plaintiffs and defendants in infringement matters.
- Non-Practising Entities (NPEs).
- Organisations looking to sell, license or share their intellectual property.
What Makes Synoptic IP Different
- Searching across more than ten languages.
- A high level of technical expertise — academics, industry scientists and lawyers — contributing their perspective on the technology and the search.
- Quick turnaround on your request.
- Collaboration with well-known institutions to understand reverse engineering of goods and technology.
Client TestimonialsWords From Our Clients
Verified LinkedIn reviews and client correspondence from patent attorneys and in-house IP teams who come back to us project after project.
LinkedIn review ★★★★★I used Synoptic for a validity search and was pleased with the results. The rates were highly competitive, the deliverable was on time, and the results were as good as (if not better than) other searches I’ve used.
Erin J. FoxIntellectual Property Counsel · ITWPublic & verifiedLinkedIn review
★★★★★Ankit did a very thorough and professional job on a claim chart assignment for us. He showed great perseverance when things got difficult and was able to get the job done. I would work with him again.
Eric BrownIP Consultant · Building Viable Licensing ProgramsPublic & verified
Client email ★★★★★Thank you — the search was quite helpful. We’ll have your invoice processed promptly.
QBPatent AttorneyQuarles & Brady · Client since 2018Name withheld
Client email ★★★★★Thank you for your work on this matter. We were pleased with the search and will consider you for future searches.
MGPatent AttorneyMerchant & Gould · Client since 2018Name withheld
Client email ★★★★★We were very pleased with the patentability and FTO report that you produced for us back in November 2024.
FBClient ContactFrontierBio · Client since 2024Name withheld