We keep patent research simple and accountable. Our search reports put the conclusion first, rank each prior art reference by relevance, and map it to the key features of your claims, with zero reference padding. A flat fee lets us invest more time in the search itself.
How We Work
Prior art references and conclusions, not bulky reports
You need the relevant prior art and a clear conclusion, not a bulky report. Our search report ranks each prior art reference by relevance and maps its pertinent passages to the key features of your claims. The report also records the search strategy: the databases covered, the keyword and classification (CPC/IPC) queries, and the patent and non-patent literature reviewed.
Direct access to the senior specialist running your search
One senior specialist with expertise in your technology handles your search from intake to the final report and is accountable for its quality. The specialist first analyzes the invention disclosure or the patent claims and sends you the key features and the search scope for approval. After you approve, the specialist executes the search and walks you through the prior art references and the conclusion on a call.
A flat fee, quoted before the search starts
We quote a flat fee for each search before work begins. The fee reflects the technology, the number of claims, and the jurisdictions covered, and we build it around your budget. Because the fee is fixed, we invest more search time than the industry norm without cutting quality to control cost. Our experienced team also reduces the cost of each search.
AI-assisted search, checked by a qualified patent professional
We use AI tools to strengthen the search strategy, not to replace the specialist. The tools suggest keyword combinations, synonyms, and classification (CPC/IPC) codes that widen the search. They also run semantic searches that find prior art described in different terminology and rank the results for review. A qualified patent professional reads every reference and judges what it does to the claim.
Client TestimonialsWords From Our Clients
Verified LinkedIn reviews and client correspondence from patent attorneys and in-house IP teams who come back to us project after project.
LinkedIn review ★★★★★I used Synoptic for a validity search and was pleased with the results. The rates were highly competitive, the deliverable was on time, and the results were as good as (if not better than) other searches I’ve used.
Erin J. FoxIntellectual Property Counsel · ITWPublic & verifiedLinkedIn review
★★★★★Ankit did a very thorough and professional job on a claim chart assignment for us. He showed great perseverance when things got difficult and was able to get the job done. I would work with him again.
Eric BrownIP Consultant · Building Viable Licensing ProgramsPublic & verified
Client email ★★★★★Thank you — the search was quite helpful. We’ll have your invoice processed promptly.
QBPatent AttorneyQuarles & Brady · Client since 2018Name withheld
Client email ★★★★★Thank you for your work on this matter. We were pleased with the search and will consider you for future searches.
MGPatent AttorneyMerchant & Gould · Client since 2018Name withheld
Client email ★★★★★We were very pleased with the patentability and FTO report that you produced for us back in November 2024.
FBClient ContactFrontierBio · Client since 2024Name withheld